<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments for Vijith Assar	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.vijithassar.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vijithassar.com/feeds/comments.php</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2018 20:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Better Literate Programming by Vijith Assar &#8226; Easier Literate Programming		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2900/better-literate-programming#comment-23186</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vijith Assar &#8226; Easier Literate Programming]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 22:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2900#comment-23186</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] tools I&#8217;ve been building for literate programming, such as lit and the Markdown import plugin for Rollup, are powerful and [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] tools I&#8217;ve been building for literate programming, such as lit and the Markdown import plugin for Rollup, are powerful and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Literate Programming by Vijith Assar &#8226; Better Literate Programming		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2541/literate-programming#comment-23185</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vijith Assar &#8226; Better Literate Programming]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2017 17:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2541#comment-23185</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] several big updates recently to the original version of lit, my agnostic tool for literate [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] several big updates recently to the original version of lit, my agnostic tool for literate [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How To Block Genius.com Annotations by Whose website is it, anyway? - The Parallax		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2641/how-to-block-genius-annotations#comment-21747</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Whose website is it, anyway? - The Parallax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2641#comment-21747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] She says that News Genius has no plans to allow publishers of personal sites to opt out, although a pair of Web developers have each released tools that technologically sophisticated publishers can use to block annotations. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] She says that News Genius has no plans to allow publishers of personal sites to opt out, although a pair of Web developers have each released tools that technologically sophisticated publishers can use to block annotations. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How To Block Genius.com Annotations by Genius: $56.9 Million in Funding, 6+ Years to Add a Report Abuse Button &#124; ManagingCommunities.com: Community Manager Blog		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2641/how-to-block-genius-annotations#comment-21405</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Genius: $56.9 Million in Funding, 6+ Years to Add a Report Abuse Button &#124; ManagingCommunities.com: Community Manager Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2016 10:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2641#comment-21405</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] asked Genius for a way to opt-out of on-page annotations. The company has refused, but of course, unaffiliated developers have stepped up to provide [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] asked Genius for a way to opt-out of on-page annotations. The company has refused, but of course, unaffiliated developers have stepped up to provide [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How To Block Genius.com Annotations by Congresswoman Katherine Clark Sent Genius a Letter About Online Abuse &#124; Re/code		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2641/how-to-block-genius-annotations#comment-21184</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Congresswoman Katherine Clark Sent Genius a Letter About Online Abuse &#124; Re/code]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2016 20:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2641#comment-21184</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] A couple different programmers have developed workarounds for people looking to disable Genius annotations [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] A couple different programmers have developed workarounds for people looking to disable Genius annotations [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How To Block Genius.com Annotations by Web Annotation Tool Gets Genius Into Trouble. Again. &#124; Re/code		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2641/how-to-block-genius-annotations#comment-21151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Web Annotation Tool Gets Genius Into Trouble. Again. &#124; Re/code]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2641#comment-21151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Hassar, a programmer who works at the New York Times, was so moved by Dawson&#8217;s post that he wrote a workaround for Web pages to block Genius&#8217;s Web annotation tool, called Genius Defender. In aggregate, [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Hassar, a programmer who works at the New York Times, was so moved by Dawson&#8217;s post that he wrote a workaround for Web pages to block Genius&#8217;s Web annotation tool, called Genius Defender. In aggregate, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How To Block Genius.com Annotations by Soi-disant Genius is a magnet for condescension		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2641/how-to-block-genius-annotations#comment-21144</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Soi-disant Genius is a magnet for condescension]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2641#comment-21144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Vijith Assar came up with an approach that mangles your webpage to be full of invisible unicode separators so genius can&#039;t parse it. I [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Vijith Assar came up with an approach that mangles your webpage to be full of invisible unicode separators so genius can&#039;t parse it. I [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How To Block Genius.com Annotations by There’s Now a Script to Block Genius from Annotating Your Website &#124; Motherboard		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2641/how-to-block-genius-annotations#comment-21143</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[There’s Now a Script to Block Genius from Annotating Your Website &#124; Motherboard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 21:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2641#comment-21143</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] That’s why Vijith Assar built Genius Defender, a tool to block web annotations by making the text of your blog unreadable to Genius. “Not everything needs or deserves freeform annotation by users, and some things—some people—may be actively or disproportionately harmed by it,” Assar wrote on his blog. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] That’s why Vijith Assar built Genius Defender, a tool to block web annotations by making the text of your blog unreadable to Genius. “Not everything needs or deserves freeform annotation by users, and some things—some people—may be actively or disproportionately harmed by it,” Assar wrote on his blog. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on How To Block Genius.com Annotations by Knowledge is Power &#124; There’s Now a Script to Block Genius from Annotating Your Website		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2641/how-to-block-genius-annotations#comment-21140</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knowledge is Power &#124; There’s Now a Script to Block Genius from Annotating Your Website]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2641#comment-21140</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] That&#8217;s why Vijith Assar built Genius Defender, a tool to block web annotations by making the text of your blog unreadable to Genius. &#8220;Not everything needs or deserves freeform annotation by users, and some things&#8212;some people&#8212;may be actively or disproportionately harmed by it,&#8221; Assar wrote on his blog. [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] That&rsquo;s why Vijith Assar built Genius Defender, a tool to block web annotations by making the text of your blog unreadable to Genius. &ldquo;Not everything needs or deserves freeform annotation by users, and some things&mdash;some people&mdash;may be actively or disproportionately harmed by it,&rdquo; Assar wrote on his blog. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Facepalm Pilot by Vijith Assar		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2396/facepalm-pilot#comment-20733</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vijith Assar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 21:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2396#comment-20733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.vijithassar.com/2396/facepalm-pilot#comment-20732&quot;&gt;Bill&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks! That was built with &lt;a href=&quot;https://d3js.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;D3&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.vijithassar.com/2396/facepalm-pilot#comment-20732">Bill</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks! That was built with <a href="https://d3js.org" rel="nofollow">D3</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Facepalm Pilot by Bill		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2396/facepalm-pilot#comment-20732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2015 17:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2396#comment-20732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Vijith, love your articles. What tool/technology did you use to create the interactive network diagram in the zombie article?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vijith, love your articles. What tool/technology did you use to create the interactive network diagram in the zombie article?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Gracenote by Vijith Assar		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2334/gracenote#comment-4885</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vijith Assar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2014 23:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2334#comment-4885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.vijithassar.com/2334/gracenote#comment-4883&quot;&gt;r721&lt;/a&gt;.

Yep – much to my dismay, after Slashdot was bought by Dice they decided to kill off the original reporting division, and also even took down the existing sites completely and imported all the old articles into Dice News.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.vijithassar.com/2334/gracenote#comment-4883">r721</a>.</p>
<p>Yep – much to my dismay, after Slashdot was bought by Dice they decided to kill off the original reporting division, and also even took down the existing sites completely and imported all the old articles into Dice News.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Gracenote by r721		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2334/gracenote#comment-4883</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[r721]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2014 00:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2334#comment-4883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello! I had that slashdot/bi link in bookmarks, but it shows ERR_CONNECTION_RESET now, was their SlashBI section closed? I googled and found the same article on news.dice.com, is it a new permanent address for it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello! I had that slashdot/bi link in bookmarks, but it shows ERR_CONNECTION_RESET now, was their SlashBI section closed? I googled and found the same article on news.dice.com, is it a new permanent address for it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Blink Blink Blink by Vijith Assar		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2228/blink#comment-605</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vijith Assar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 21:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2228#comment-605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It was a pretty complex article and you&#039;re right that we didn&#039;t have space to really dive into the lineage from KHTML to WebKit, but the 2005 timeline is still accurate. I&#039;ve forwarded your comments to my editor, though -- thanks for reading!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a pretty complex article and you&#8217;re right that we didn&#8217;t have space to really dive into the lineage from KHTML to WebKit, but the 2005 timeline is still accurate. I&#8217;ve forwarded your comments to my editor, though &#8212; thanks for reading!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Blink Blink Blink by Brandon Edens		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/2228/blink#comment-604</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon Edens]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 19:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=2228#comment-604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi there,
Apple did not open source Webkit. Their &quot;rendering engine&quot; was originally KHTML created by the KDE team. Can you please update your New Yorker article to reflect this. You spend so much of your article giving proper credit that this oversite can&#039;t stand. Additionally its even more important as Apple has been such a poor free software community member / collaborator. Please update your article in light of the following:
http://apple.slashdot.org/story/05/04/29/1556252/safari-and-khtml-may-never-meet
http://apple.slashdot.org/story/05/05/12/1555240/safari-vs-khtml
http://laforge.gnumonks.org/weblog/2011/05/06/#20110506-applewebkit_lgpl
and
http://www.tuaw.com/2011/05/09/apple-releases-ios-4-3-3-webkit-source-but-stretches-the-spirit/

Perhaps a paragraph about the GPL / LGPL might have been appropriate too?

and finally.
As your article was primarily composed of discussion of the relationship between browsers it might have been nice to have read some about Mosaic and the relationship that Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator have to that piece of software:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_(web_browser)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,<br />
Apple did not open source Webkit. Their &#8220;rendering engine&#8221; was originally KHTML created by the KDE team. Can you please update your New Yorker article to reflect this. You spend so much of your article giving proper credit that this oversite can&#8217;t stand. Additionally its even more important as Apple has been such a poor free software community member / collaborator. Please update your article in light of the following:<br />
<a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/story/05/04/29/1556252/safari-and-khtml-may-never-meet" rel="nofollow ugc">http://apple.slashdot.org/story/05/04/29/1556252/safari-and-khtml-may-never-meet</a><br />
<a href="http://apple.slashdot.org/story/05/05/12/1555240/safari-vs-khtml" rel="nofollow ugc">http://apple.slashdot.org/story/05/05/12/1555240/safari-vs-khtml</a><br />
<a href="http://laforge.gnumonks.org/weblog/2011/05/06/#20110506-applewebkit_lgpl" rel="nofollow ugc">http://laforge.gnumonks.org/weblog/2011/05/06/#20110506-applewebkit_lgpl</a><br />
and<br />
<a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2011/05/09/apple-releases-ios-4-3-3-webkit-source-but-stretches-the-spirit/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.tuaw.com/2011/05/09/apple-releases-ios-4-3-3-webkit-source-but-stretches-the-spirit/</a></p>
<p>Perhaps a paragraph about the GPL / LGPL might have been appropriate too?</p>
<p>and finally.<br />
As your article was primarily composed of discussion of the relationship between browsers it might have been nice to have read some about Mosaic and the relationship that Internet Explorer and Netscape Navigator have to that piece of software:<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_(web_browser)" rel="nofollow ugc">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_(web_browser)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Have you seen my blog posts about CMJ? Y/N by Vijith Assar &#187; Maura Magazine		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/1822/cmj-2012-charts#comment-595</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vijith Assar &#187; Maura Magazine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=1822#comment-595</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] as before, a shout out to my good friend Buster Bylander, who jumped in with his amazing design sense once I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] as before, a shout out to my good friend Buster Bylander, who jumped in with his amazing design sense once I [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Chicken Little by Vijith Assar		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/1915/james-bond-theme-songs#comment-578</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vijith Assar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=1915#comment-578</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OK, I just talked to the editors and they&#039;re going to append a footnote about this. Obviously I wish I&#039;d never overlooked it in the first place, but I&#039;m actually delighted that non-musician readers were totally able to follow along and call me out on this rather esoteric point.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I just talked to the editors and they&#8217;re going to append a footnote about this. Obviously I wish I&#8217;d never overlooked it in the first place, but I&#8217;m actually delighted that non-musician readers were totally able to follow along and call me out on this rather esoteric point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Chicken Little by Vijith Assar		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/1915/james-bond-theme-songs#comment-575</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vijith Assar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 20:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=1915#comment-575</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow, thanks Patrick! Sorry my response is so disjointed, but here goes...

1) First: shit, goddamnit, you&#039;re right! No idea how I missed that; just got lost juggling 20-some songs and 80-some scores, I guess. Egg on my face.

2) This article has been out for a few days and even though Adele certainly has her supporters, you&#039;re the first one to point this out. Well done! I&#039;m pretty surprised that nobody else noticed my mistake, though -- I could launch into a rant here about how this indicates the need for improved arts education in public schools, but I think I&#039;ll save that for another post.

3) With that said, saying it was &quot;severely underscored&quot; overstates the extent of the problem -- Adele actually already scored quite high on cohesion anyway. I said in the introduction that there are many ways to &quot;sound like a Bond theme,&quot; and Adele has already won 8 out of 10 of those points based more on texture and mood. Which is to say -- even considering your point, which is correct, there&#039;s not much room to increase on this axis, because we&#039;re already in agreement that her song is excellent in the cohesion arena.

4) Both Adele and Jack White actually already got half-credit for cohesion even as it applies to the suspense motif because of their use of a compatible chord sequence. Apologies if I&#039;m diving in too deep into music theory dork mode for you here, but in composition there&#039;s something called &quot;voice leading,&quot; which is the arrangement of specific notes within a chord. It can be hard for the human ear to pick out notes that are buried in the middle of a chord, but we usually hear the highest and lowest notes quite clearly as the &quot;lead melody&quot; and &quot;bass&quot; voices. Since those other notes are still flopping about in between, though, the presence of the chords often implies the presence of the specific melody, even if it&#039;s harder to hear. Most of my chatter on this point in the article was about more obvious melodic applications because I think all this was a bit too much to delve into with the readers, but the points for this are already there, even if the article text doesn&#039;t get into it too much.

5) It&#039;s in a way that&#039;s different from point #4 but has the same effect, I&#039;d argue that Adele&#039;s use of the suspense motif was likewise understated. It only appears once, at the specific point you mention, and it&#039;s never in the foreground -- she&#039;s always singing on top of it. So in my defense, it&#039;s kind of mind-boggling to me that they would under-utilize such an important element to such an extent that I could miss it completely. Compare this to Chris Cornell, who used the suspense motif repeatedly and prominently, and then also filled the song with similar chromatic motion that parallels and evokes the suspense motif even when it&#039;s not actually being played. Check out the diminished fifth that appears under the last syllable of the lines &quot;I&#039;ve seen angels fall from blinding heights&quot; and &quot;I&#039;ve seen this diamond cut through harder men&quot; -- that&#039;s not actually the suspense motif, but the chord is dramatically outside the expectations outlined by tonal harmony, and once that grabs your attention, a flatted-fifth diminished chord is also just about the Bond-iest thing you can play in that sequence. I know I&#039;m already coming across as a huge fanboy for his song, but for my money it&#039;s the most compositionally clever of the bunch, sunk more due to dull and inappropriate production details more than anything else.

6) I&#039;m still hesitant to bump Adele up to a perfect 10 on cohesion. Back when her song was first released, Daphne Carr of Capital New York wrote a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/culture/2012/10/6537827/adeles-skyfall-its-heavy-debt-shirley-bassey-might-not-have-been-cam&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;much more attentive takedown&lt;/a&gt; than I&#039;d care to, so I&#039;ll just quote her:

&lt;blockquote&gt;To fit the definition of a &quot;theme song,&quot; a song must really engage with the thematic material in a way that is recognizable and memorable. Like Bond, it must be bold... [Adele has] fulfilled the definition of the term &quot;theme song&quot; without doing much about the spirit of it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

7) The article&#039;s conclusions still hold because Adele could only numerically tie Bassey if she had a perfect 10 on both cohesion and reach, and no other song in the series scored a perfect 10 in multiple categories. You clearly like her song more than I do, but I suspect you&#039;ll understand why I&#039;m skeptical that she&#039;d be the one to break this barrier. Even if Adele were to numerically tie with Shirley Bassey and Garbage for the #1 slot, we resolved numerical ties through human editorial decisions and wouldn&#039;t have given her the edge over those other two. But in any case, Adele is currently unranked pending a reach score, so altering her points doesn&#039;t have any effects. I&#039;ll happily meet you back here in twenty years to continue this debate, though.

So: you are correct, but there are only two cohesion points in dispute here, and I&#039;d be willing to concede one of them, but that doesn&#039;t really change much else. Great sleuthing though, and I appreciate the close read.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, thanks Patrick! Sorry my response is so disjointed, but here goes&#8230;</p>
<p>1) First: shit, goddamnit, you&#8217;re right! No idea how I missed that; just got lost juggling 20-some songs and 80-some scores, I guess. Egg on my face.</p>
<p>2) This article has been out for a few days and even though Adele certainly has her supporters, you&#8217;re the first one to point this out. Well done! I&#8217;m pretty surprised that nobody else noticed my mistake, though &#8212; I could launch into a rant here about how this indicates the need for improved arts education in public schools, but I think I&#8217;ll save that for another post.</p>
<p>3) With that said, saying it was &#8220;severely underscored&#8221; overstates the extent of the problem &#8212; Adele actually already scored quite high on cohesion anyway. I said in the introduction that there are many ways to &#8220;sound like a Bond theme,&#8221; and Adele has already won 8 out of 10 of those points based more on texture and mood. Which is to say &#8212; even considering your point, which is correct, there&#8217;s not much room to increase on this axis, because we&#8217;re already in agreement that her song is excellent in the cohesion arena.</p>
<p>4) Both Adele and Jack White actually already got half-credit for cohesion even as it applies to the suspense motif because of their use of a compatible chord sequence. Apologies if I&#8217;m diving in too deep into music theory dork mode for you here, but in composition there&#8217;s something called &#8220;voice leading,&#8221; which is the arrangement of specific notes within a chord. It can be hard for the human ear to pick out notes that are buried in the middle of a chord, but we usually hear the highest and lowest notes quite clearly as the &#8220;lead melody&#8221; and &#8220;bass&#8221; voices. Since those other notes are still flopping about in between, though, the presence of the chords often implies the presence of the specific melody, even if it&#8217;s harder to hear. Most of my chatter on this point in the article was about more obvious melodic applications because I think all this was a bit too much to delve into with the readers, but the points for this are already there, even if the article text doesn&#8217;t get into it too much.</p>
<p>5) It&#8217;s in a way that&#8217;s different from point #4 but has the same effect, I&#8217;d argue that Adele&#8217;s use of the suspense motif was likewise understated. It only appears once, at the specific point you mention, and it&#8217;s never in the foreground &#8212; she&#8217;s always singing on top of it. So in my defense, it&#8217;s kind of mind-boggling to me that they would under-utilize such an important element to such an extent that I could miss it completely. Compare this to Chris Cornell, who used the suspense motif repeatedly and prominently, and then also filled the song with similar chromatic motion that parallels and evokes the suspense motif even when it&#8217;s not actually being played. Check out the diminished fifth that appears under the last syllable of the lines &#8220;I&#8217;ve seen angels fall from blinding heights&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;ve seen this diamond cut through harder men&#8221; &#8212; that&#8217;s not actually the suspense motif, but the chord is dramatically outside the expectations outlined by tonal harmony, and once that grabs your attention, a flatted-fifth diminished chord is also just about the Bond-iest thing you can play in that sequence. I know I&#8217;m already coming across as a huge fanboy for his song, but for my money it&#8217;s the most compositionally clever of the bunch, sunk more due to dull and inappropriate production details more than anything else.</p>
<p>6) I&#8217;m still hesitant to bump Adele up to a perfect 10 on cohesion. Back when her song was first released, Daphne Carr of Capital New York wrote a <a href="http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/culture/2012/10/6537827/adeles-skyfall-its-heavy-debt-shirley-bassey-might-not-have-been-cam" rel="nofollow">much more attentive takedown</a> than I&#8217;d care to, so I&#8217;ll just quote her:</p>
<blockquote><p>To fit the definition of a &#8220;theme song,&#8221; a song must really engage with the thematic material in a way that is recognizable and memorable. Like Bond, it must be bold&#8230; [Adele has] fulfilled the definition of the term &#8220;theme song&#8221; without doing much about the spirit of it.</p></blockquote>
<p>7) The article&#8217;s conclusions still hold because Adele could only numerically tie Bassey if she had a perfect 10 on both cohesion and reach, and no other song in the series scored a perfect 10 in multiple categories. You clearly like her song more than I do, but I suspect you&#8217;ll understand why I&#8217;m skeptical that she&#8217;d be the one to break this barrier. Even if Adele were to numerically tie with Shirley Bassey and Garbage for the #1 slot, we resolved numerical ties through human editorial decisions and wouldn&#8217;t have given her the edge over those other two. But in any case, Adele is currently unranked pending a reach score, so altering her points doesn&#8217;t have any effects. I&#8217;ll happily meet you back here in twenty years to continue this debate, though.</p>
<p>So: you are correct, but there are only two cohesion points in dispute here, and I&#8217;d be willing to concede one of them, but that doesn&#8217;t really change much else. Great sleuthing though, and I appreciate the close read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on Chicken Little by Patrick		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/1915/james-bond-theme-songs#comment-574</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:43:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vijithassar.com/?p=1915#comment-574</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey Vijith - loved the piece, but I believe you severely underrated Adele&#039;s Skyfall for not using the &quot;suspense motif.&quot; The motif, as I understand it, can clearly be heard at the end of the first chorus and it repeats for about 30 seconds. Have another listen:

http://youtu.be/7HKoqNJtMTQ?t=1m51s

This song, to me, is one of the all time great Bond themes. Adele has a big voice that melds perfectly with the signature themes of the series. Plus, she&#039;s British, which should get her a couple of extra points.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Vijith &#8211; loved the piece, but I believe you severely underrated Adele&#8217;s Skyfall for not using the &#8220;suspense motif.&#8221; The motif, as I understand it, can clearly be heard at the end of the first chorus and it repeats for about 30 seconds. Have another listen:</p>
<p><a href="http://youtu.be/7HKoqNJtMTQ?t=1m51s" rel="nofollow ugc">http://youtu.be/7HKoqNJtMTQ?t=1m51s</a></p>
<p>This song, to me, is one of the all time great Bond themes. Adele has a big voice that melds perfectly with the signature themes of the series. Plus, she&#8217;s British, which should get her a couple of extra points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		Comment on CMJ 2008 by Vijith Assar &#187; Have you seen my blog posts about CMJ? Y/N		</title>
		<link>https://www.vijithassar.com/189/cmj-2008#comment-566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vijith Assar &#187; Have you seen my blog posts about CMJ? Y/N]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 19:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vijithassar.com/?p=189#comment-566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] York&#8217;s annual CMJ music festival is happening again this week. I&#8217;ve written about it before via short concert reviews of the litany of shows held across the city, but this time I wanted to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] York&#8217;s annual CMJ music festival is happening again this week. I&#8217;ve written about it before via short concert reviews of the litany of shows held across the city, but this time I wanted to [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
